Published on:

Craigslist-post conviction thrown out; criminal defamation law ruled unconstitutional

J. Bradley Smith of Arnold & Smith, PLLC answers the question “Should I ever plead guilty to a charge?”

 

The axiom that “The truth shall set you free” is, in my opinion, a bit overused and often used out of context. The quote—from the eighth chapter of the Gospel according to John, in the New Testament of the Bible—is quite specific in its meaning.

Laptop Uptown Charlotte Criminal Attorney Mecklenburg DWI LawyerThe quote’s origin notwithstanding, the truth—or at least the specter of truth—torpedoed a Minnesota man’s conviction for criminal defamation last week, and in the process derailed the state’s entire criminal defamation law.

The case involved Timothy Robert Turner. Two summers ago he had an argument with his former girlfriend. After the argument, he was so angry with her that he posted sexually explicit messages apparently sent to him by his former girlfriend as well as messages referencing her daughter on Craigslist, a well-known classified advertising web site.

Several men took the messages as advertisements for sexual activity and contacted both the former girlfriend and her minor daughter on their cell phones. Turner provided working cell-phone numbers for both the ex-girlfriend and her daughter in the posts. Some men sent pornographic images to the minor daughter.

Turner was convicted of criminal defamation and sentenced to a fine and thirty days in jail. He appealed the conviction, however, arguing that Minnesota’s criminal defamation law violated the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. The First Amendment protects persons from infringements upon their freedom of speech, including the criminalization of certain kinds of speech.

Minnesota criminal defense attorney Mark Anfinson said the North Star State’s criminal defamation law—passed in 1963—was “a sitting duck constitutionally for decades.” He added that prosecutions based on criminal defamation in Minnesota were rare even before the Turner case.

John Arechigo, the criminal defense attorney who represented Turner, said he has seen the same kinds of issues arise in so-called “revenge porn” cases. In those instances, angry ex-paramours post sexually explicit photos or videos of their exes, often nude and engaged in erstwhile-consensual sex acts.

Anfinson said that while Turner did not post any photos or videos of the ex-girlfriend or her daughter, he agreed with Minnesota Court of Appeals Judge Denise Reilly, who wrote that Turner’s behavior was “reprehensible and defamatory.” Despite that, however, she and two other judges comprising the three-judge panel that considered Turner’s appeal struck down the criminal defamation law, writing that because of its broad language, the law had the potential to criminalize true statements.

Truth is an absolute defense to civil suits based on slander or defamation, and as the Court of Appeals noted, true statements are protected by the First Amendment. In striking down the law, the Court observed that the standard for winning a conviction was actually less stringent than the standard for winning a defamation case in civil court, according to the Minneapolis Star-Tribune. In general, given the differing standards, criminal convictions should be more difficult to obtain than prevailing in a civil action.

Anfinson told the Star-Tribune that the Court of Appeals’ ruling is on the side of people “who are clearly guilty of very serious behavior,” but he said the more serious interest is the First Amendment’s guarantee of free speech. “You can debate the principle, but it’s a noble one,” he said.

Arnold & Smith, PLLC is a Charlotte based criminal defense, traffic violation defense and civil litigation law firm servicing Charlotte and the surrounding area. If you or someone you know needs the assistance of an experienced criminal defense attorney in Charlotte, North Carolina, please contact Arnold & Smith, PLLC today at (704) 370-2828   or find additional resources here.

 


About the Author

jbradley.jpgBrad Smith is a Managing Member of Arnold & Smith, PLLC, where he focuses on the areas of criminal defense, DUI / DWI defense and traffic defense.

Mr. Smith was born and raised in Charlotte. He began his legal career as an Assistant District Attorney before entering private practice in 2006.

In his free time, Mr. Smith enjoys traveling, boating, golf, hiking and spending time with his wife and three children.

 

 

Sources:

http://www.startribune.com/minnesota-court-strikes-down-criminal-defamation-law-in-overturning-conviction-of-craigslist-revenge-poster/305044301/

 

 

Image Credit

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:User_with_Workrave_installed_on_computer.jpg

 

 

See Our Related Video from our YouTube channel:

https://www.youtube.com/user/ArnoldSmithPLLC/videos

 

 

See Our Related Blog Posts:

Conviction overturned because man’s fish were not “tangible objects”

New hacking legislation could make criminals of us all, say insiders