Attorney J. Bradley Smith answering the question: “Are breath test results always accurate?”

North Carolina Department of Transportation officials announced that nearly 1,800 drivers across the state were arrested over the July Fourth holiday period. DOT officials say the huge number of arrests were the result of an important collaboration between the Governor’s Highway Safety Program and state DOT.

Car Keys Charlotte North Carolina DUI DWI Criminal Defense Attorney Lawyer.jpgThe campaign was an attempt by law enforcement officials to make the Independence Day holiday a safe one for North Carolinians. Though police officers say they always watch for drunk drivers, the push was especially intense over the holiday weekend because the Fourth of July is often the deadliest holiday for motorists each year. According to AAA, 20 of the 36 traffic deaths that occurred last year in North Carolina were linked to alcohol use.

The cooperation between the two organizations, officially known as “Operation Firecracker,” led to 1,737 arrests in the days surrounding the Fourth of July. Though this is certainly an enormous number of arrests, it is actually less than the haul last year. DOT officials said last year law enforcement officers arrested just under 2,000 people on drunk driving charges over the July fourth period.

The huge number of arrests over the period is partially due to the increased enforcement efforts and partially due to the presence of alcohol at many summer holiday gatherings. Grilling and drinking often go hand-in-hand and many find a nice way to cool down during such hot weather is to have a cold alcoholic beverage. While this is perfectly fine, it’s critical that you make plans in advance to find a safe way home, either designating a person to stay sober and drive or calling a cab. Doing so avoids the big headache that follows a DWI arrest in North Carolina.

Continue reading

Attorney J. Bradley Smith answering the question: “Should I talk to the police?”

Authorities say that two sex offenders in the state were recently arrested in Salisbury, NC for various violations. One offender was arrested after failing to notify the local Rowan County Sherriff’s Office about a change of address and the other for living within 1,00 feet of a childcare center.

Day Care Blocks Charlotte North Carolina Criminal Defense DUI DWI Lawyer Attorney.jpgPolice say they were searching for Phillip Berryman for more than a month after Berryman was found to be living too close to a childcare center. Berryman is now being held under $100,00 bond and has been charged with a sex offender residence violation for living too close to a child care center. This is not the first time Berryman was arrested for a violation of his terms of release. Back in 2006 and 2008 he was jailed for failing to register with authorities. His original sex crime took place in 2005.

Police say they received a tip back in June that Berryman was living too close to the Salisbury Child Care and Fine Arts Center. According to North Carolina General Statute 14-208.16(a), sex offenders in North Carolina are prohibited from residing within 1,000 feet of the property on which a school or childcare facility is located. Once the warrant was issued for his arrest, police say Berryman only made the problem worse by fleeing. The U.S. Marshals Service was then brought in to help track Berryman and ended up locating him a neighboring county.

The second offender recently arrested is Stephen Aydelotte who was charged with failure to register. Aydelotte is a sex offender from Utah who was originally convicted of third degree sexual exploitation of a minor. Aydelotte is in double trouble for having failed to tell Utah authorities that he planned to move to North Carolina in May of last year and then failing to register with North Carolina authorities upon his arrival.

Continue reading

Attorney J. Bradley Smith answering the question: “What is the difference between a misdemeanor and a felony?”

The office of the U.S. Attorney announced that it had issued indictments for 17 men and women living in and around Charlotte, NC this past week regarding their involvement in a large-scale methamphetamine trafficking operation. The charges were unsealed earlier this week and the individuals were arrested on Tuesday.

Coffee Filter Charlotte North Carolina Criminal Defense DUI DWI Attorney Lawyer.jpgPolice say the recent indictments were the result of a large-scale, multi-year joint federal and state investigation that targeted those responsible for manufacturing and distributing methamphetamine in Western North Carolina. The 17 people charged in the criminal enterprise were accused of conspiring to distribute, possess, distribute and manufacture more than 500 grams of methamphetamine as well as possession of pseudoephedrine.

Those charged range in age from 21 to 53. Police say that those indicted also possessed a variety of substances to help further their production of meth, including huge supplies of coffee filters, lithium batters and two-liter plastic bottles. When police finally moved on their information to arrest the participants, they ended up shutting down 15 different methamphetamine labs spread across the region.

Authorities say the meth conspiracy charges carry a mandatory minimum sentence of 10 years behind bars and a maximum of life in prison. The charge also includes a potential $10 million fine. Possession of pseudoephedrine comes with a prison term of up to 20 years and a $250,000 fine. Possession of materials to make meth also includes a term of up to 20 years and a $250,000 fine. That means those arrested in the recent bust are facing potentially decades behind bars.

Continue reading

Attorney J. Bradley Smith answering the question: “Can the police search my car without a warrant?”

Many people know that the U.S. Constitution affords criminal defendants the right to confront their accusers. Though that seems clear enough, the North Carolina Supreme Court has recently wrestled with the problem of what to do if the accuser is not a person, but instead a lab test. Does the test speak for itself or do its results require the use of an expert witness?

Lab test Charlotte North Carolina Criminal Defense DUI DWI Lawyer Attorney.jpgThe state Supreme Court issued a ruling on the matter this week and found that such lab tests can stand on their own if cited by an expert witness offering an independent opinion. Other have argued that this conclusion is incorrect and that a lab test should face the same amount of scrutiny that a person would face and that means the analyst who conducted the test should be required to testify at trial.

Some criminal defense experts in North Carolina believe the Confrontation Clause requires that the person who actually handled the steps of conducting the lab test be in court to answer questions about exactly what was done. Only then can the defendant be said to truly have had the right to confront his or her accuser.

The case before the Court involved a traffic stop by Charlotte-Mecklenburg police in 2007 that led to the discovery of what appeared to be cocaine. The defendant, Mario Eduardo Ortiz-Zape, was charged with possessing 4.5 grams of cocaine with the intent to sell or deliver it. The crime lab analyst who tested the cocaine was no longer employed by the agency when the case finally made its way to trial so prosecutors instead called an analyst with the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department crime lab to act as an expert witness and offer her independent opinion about the test.

Continue reading

Attorney J. Bradley Smith answering the question: “A past conviction is keeping me from finding work what can I do?”

Authorities say two individuals have been arrested for using phony prescriptions to get painkillers from pharmacies across North and South Carolina. The two individuals, Steven Rhodes and Heather DeYoung, were each sentenced to nearly six years behind bars.

Prescription Pills Charlotte Criminal Defense DUI DWI Lawyer Attorney North Carolina.jpgFederal prosecutors say the leader of the fake prescription ring, Joshua Balkind, is already in prison serving a 20-year term. The other two participants were sentenced to 70 months in prison this Wednesday. Officials say the scheme worked by having Balkind make fake prescriptions using software on his home computer. He would then give the fake oxycodone prescriptions to drug addicts like Rhodes and DeYoung and essentially split the take, giving the addicts several pills and taking the rest to sell on the streets at a steep markup.

The drug ring was first discovered back in 2011 when a pharmacist in Union County realized that the doctor Balkind had chosen for his fake prescriptions had actually been dead for several years. Authorities then began following the group and eventually gathered enough information to make several arrests.

It’s important to understand that even though prescription drugs come from a pharmacy, they are still controlled substances that can lead to serious legal trouble for anyone found to have illegally obtained them. If such possession was obtained through the use of fraud, forgery or deceit, then prosecutors will be very aggressive in pushing for jail time as punishment.

Continue reading

Attorney J. Bradley Smith answering the question: “If I simply intend to plead guilty, why do I need a lawyer?”

A divided Supreme Court ruled in an important case last week that it is unconstitutional for judges to use current federal sentencing guidelines if they contain harsher penalties than the sentencing guidelines in place at the time the original crime was committed.

The case before the Court dealt with whether current discretionary sentencing guidelines have enough force to put criminal defendant at risk of unconstitutional additional punishment. The question the justices tackled was whether current, harsher guidelines have enough weight with judges that even considering them harms the freedom of defendants whose crimes were governed by earlier sentencing guidelines. Specifically this issue concerns the ex post facto clause of the Constitution which prohibits retroactive punishment.

Supreme Court Charlotte North Carolina Criminal Defense Attorney DUI DWI Lawyer.jpgThe case, Peugh v. United States, concerned a man who committed bank fraud back in the late 1990s. It took a long time for his case to be tried and for a sentence to be handed down, more than 11 years in fact. By 2010, a new round of sentencing guidelines had been issued which contained a suggested sentencing range of between 70 and 87 months for Peugh’s crime. The issue was that at the time the crimes were perpetrated, the sentencing range was dramatically more lenient, only 30 to 37 months. The judge who heard the case ultimately chose a 70-month sentence, something that many believed was clearly influenced by the new guidelines.

Continue reading

Attorney J. Bradley Smith answering the question: “What is an expungement?”

Though hunting is usually thought of as a low-key weekend activity among friends or family, a recent cases shows how in some cases it can turn into quite a serious matter. A federal judge in the Western District of North Carolina announced last Friday that seven men from the state would be serving jail time for illegal hunting in national forests located in North Carolina and Georgia.

Deer Charlotte Criminal Defense DUI DWI Lawyer Attorney.jpgThe arrests were the result of a four-year undercover investigation into illegal hunting practices known as Operation Something Bruin. Officers with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission and the U.S. Forest Service worked together using social media to infiltrate poaching circles and record legal violations. The investigators created fake social media profiles and found out about illegal organized hunts on federal land.

The investigation led to 10 individuals pleading guilty to crimes, among whom seven men received sentences of up to 30 days behind bars. Three of the men who were charged in the most recent case pleaded guilty to hunting wild hogs at night and were sentenced to 30 days behind bars as well as prohibited from hunting or fishing of two years. Two others admitted to illegally hunting a black bear and faced similar penalties.

Officials announced in February that the sting operation led to the discovery of illegal actions by 81 individuals for a total of 980 combined violations. The investigation uncovered bear baiting, the illegal use of dogs, operating illegal bear enclosures and hunting without permits. Officials say the violations took place in the Nantahala National Forest and the Pisgah National Forest.

Continue reading

Attorney J. Bradley Smith answering the question: “A past conviction is keeping me from finding work what can I do?”

In an important divided criminal law decision released earlier this week, the U.S. Supreme Court voted 5-4 to say that silence can be used against defendants in certain circumstances.

Silence Expression Charlotte North Carolina DUI DWI Criminal Defense Lawyer Attorney.jpgThe case involves a horrible 1992 Texas double murder case where the suspect voluntarily answered police questions for nearly an hour. However, as the police asked more incriminating questions about shotgun shells found at the scene, the suspect stopped talking. Prosecutors later used Salinas’ silence against him and portrayed it as evidence of his guilt. The strategy worked like a charm for prosecutors and Salinas was found guilty.

Most people know that once a person has been arrested and read their Miranda rights, they have a right to remain silent and that silence cannot be used against them. Other Supreme Court cases have held that if a person declines to testify during a criminal trial the prosecutors are not allowed to use that decision against the defendant by negatively mentioning it to the jury. The issue in this case was whether such silence could be attacked if it occurred prior to an arrest.
Justice Alito wrote for the majority and said that the Fifth Amendment, which says a person cannot be compelled to be a witness against himself, clearly gives defendants the right to remain silent. However, the majority of the Court said that the right to remain silent is not “self-executing” and that it must be claimed for it to be used. In this case, the justices decided that because Salinas failed to properly invoke his right that his silence was properly used against him.

Continue reading

Attorney J. Bradley Smith answering the question: “What am I obligated to do if I’ve been pulled for Drinking and Driving?”

According to a recent ACLU report, the State of North Carolina spent over $55 million enforcing marijuana possession laws in 2010. The civil rights group pointed out that not only did this represent a large share of police resources wasted on relatively minor crimes, but that the impact of the marijuana enforcement was often discriminatory.

By analyzing arrest reports, the ACLU discovered that African Americans in North Carolina were arrested for marijuana possession at 3.4 times the rate of whites, this despite comparable marijuana usage rates. The report, known as Marijuana in Black and White: Billions of Dollars Wasted on Racially Biased Arrests, was released earlier this month and examined marijuana arrests rates by race. Marijuana Charlotte North Carolina DWI DUI Criminal Defense Attorney Lawyer.jpg

The survey found that law enforcement officers in North Carolina made nearly 21,000 arrests in 2010, ranking North Carolina 10th in the nation for pot arrests. The numbers also meant that marijuana possession arrests made up over half (53.6 percent) of all drug arrests in the state. A full 50 percent of those arrested for marijuana possession in North Carolina were African American, despite African Americans making up only 22 percent of the state’s population.

The ACLU says the results are clear: the state’s war on drugs has disproportionately harmed people of color. The organization says police agencies across the state selectively enforce marijuana possession laws against certain black and minority communities which ends up costing the state tens of millions of dollars incarcerating people with few positive results.

Continue reading

Attorney J. Bradley Smith answering the question: “If I simply intend to plead guilty, why do I need a lawyer?”

A recent news report revealed that far too many crimes are occurring at the Charlotte CATS transit center. The bus station in Uptown has become something of a hangout destination for some unsavory groups, which has led to increasing incidents of crime. Now that the issue has been raised publicly, Charlotte-Mecklenburg PD says they will aggressively work to stamp it out.

Skyline Charlotte North Carolina DUI DWI Criminal Defense Attorney.jpgA spokesperson for the Central Division of CMPD says that officers will be working hard over the coming days and weeks to impress upon people that the bus station is for catching a bus and nothing more. The spokesperson said the department’s position is clear that those interested in loitering can go elsewhere to hang out.

CMPD Captain Mike Campagna said that after receiving reports of various criminal activities, the police approached Allied Barton, the private security company that CATS contracts out work to. The two organizations are launching a joint effort to put a stop to loitering at the bus terminal and, hopefully, the petty crime that results from all the loitering.

Continue reading

Contact Information