The Charlotte Mecklenburg Police Department’s Violent Criminal Apprehension Team has been extremely successful, according to a recent report by WCNC news. It has not only increased the number of violent criminals being arrested, but it has also been timely when putting the cuffs on the criminals. The success of the team has landed several of Charlotte’s most violent criminals behind bars.

The team is headed up by Sergeant Steve Winterhalter. It is his job to take down those criminals that the city considers to be the most dangerous. Since the unit was formed six years ago, the team has made 2,000 arrests, which is a huge accomplishment for this team. Their 2,000th capture was a fugitive from New York who was hiding in the Charlotte area. He was arrested last week along with 20 others who were on the team’s list of bad guys. Those 21 captures set a record for the number of captures made by the team in one week.

Not only are they thorough, but they also manage to be efficient. Post #1 criminal image 5.1.12.jpgOn average, it takes the team about 19 hours from the beginning of the team’s investigation to make an arrest. Their speed prevents the alleged criminals from fleeing the jurisdiction. Winterhalter believes that some of their success is attributable to the police department being more efficient at identifying suspects. He said, “The department is responding to the incident a little bit differently. There’s increased number of resources put into the initial investigation, different bodies from within organization are helping.”

Continue reading

As a follow-up to one of our recent posts, on Wednesday, April 25, 2012, Aide to former Senator John Edwards, Andrew Young, testified at Edwards’ campaign finance violation trial. The prosecution called Young to testify about his role in hiding Rielle Hunter, Edwards’ pregnant mistress, while he was running for President of the United States. Young took the stand on Monday, April 23, 2012, and began to tell the jury about Edwards’ relationship with Rielle and about how his relationship with Edwards began to change during the presidential campaign.

Young testified that as Edwards was beginning to put an end to his campaign, he stopped communicating with Young. Post #2 criminal image 4.26.12.jpgIn December 2007, Edwards, along with Young, issued a statement to the press in which Edwards denied that he was the father of Rielle Hunter’s unborn child, saying that it was Young who was father. According to Young, Edwards was to tell the press the real story once the baby was born. Young testified that he and his wife were no longer happy about letting Hunter live with them in an attempt to keep the press away from her.

Edwards is accused of misappropriating campaign funds to hide Hunter and keep her pregnancy and subsequent child a secret. He has pleaded not guilty to six counts of campaign finance violations. If he is found guilty, Edwards could face up to 30 years in prison and $1.5 million in fines. Edwards denies knowing what the money was being used for, especially given that much of the money was put into accounts that were controlled by Young and his wife.

Continue reading

The nation is again discussing whether some educators are too quick to call in the police when a student gets a little unruly in the classroom. Every educator and parent around the country, including those in North Carolina, should be paying attention to the recent case where children are being handcuffed and charged with serious criminal offenses for acting out in class.

A 6-year-old Georgia girl sparked the national debate. Post #1 criminal image 4.24.pngEarlier this month, the 6-year-old received media attention when it was reported that after she had a temper tantrum at school, the police were called and she was handcuffed. According to reports, the girl refused to comply with her teacher’s rules and began throwing things off of the teacher’s desk. She sent the student to the principal’s office where she continued her tantrum. The student threw things off of the principal’s desk and turned over a small shelf that fell on the principal’s leg. The principal tried to calm her down, but she resisted. At that point, it was decided that the police should be called. The Milledgeville Police Department responded and placed the 6-year-old in the back of a police car and transported her to the police station. Police procedure required that anyone placed in the back of the patrol car be handcuffed.

A similar incident happened in New Mexico. A 13-year-old girl’s teacher called the police after she refused to stop talking to her friend and move to another desk. This incident prompted a civil rights attorney to file a class action suit in New Mexico on behalf of several hundred public school children arrested for petty offenses, such as cell phone use and defacing a history book. While a police presence in the school is sometimes necessary, many believe that overwhelmed teachers are beginning to use them as first responders instead of as a last resort.

Continue reading

WFMY News recently reported that a Charlotte man pleaded guilty to a handful of charges involving a string of rapes and robberies in the area. On Friday, April 13, 2012, Jaunton Carter pleaded guilty to First Degree Rape, First Degree Kidnapping, Sexual Battery, and Robbery. The judge sentenced Carter to serve 28-34 years in prison.

Carter has an unusual technique as he tricked women into thinking that they had been involved in car accidents. Post #2 criminal image 4.19.12.jpgHe used this ruse to lure them out of their cars where he would rob and then rape them. These occurred in February 2010 in the high-end residential neighborhoods of Dilworth and Myers Park in Charlotte. According to officials at CMPD, Carter ambushed a woman as she was getting out of her car on Spanish Moss Lane. It was 1:30 AM and he clasped his hands over her mouth and demanded her pocketbook. He searched through her purse for money and when he did not find any he took her cigarettes instead.

Less than 24 hours after the first robbery, Cater rear-ended another car at the intersection of Colony Road and Runnymede Lane. Two women exited the vehicle to see how much damage had been done to the vehicle. That is when Carter approached them with what they thought was a gun. He pointed it at them and demanded that they get back into the car. He got into the car with them, forcibly demanded money, and made them drive to a nearby ATM. He was apparently unable to get any money out of the ATM. Carte then made the women drive to Ferncliff Road where he made one of the women exit the car.

He raped the woman he made get out of the car while he forced the other woman to watch in horror. Carter managed to hold a gun on both of the women while he was raping one woman. He took the money that they had on them, which amounted to $6.00 and then he left the scene. Thirty minutes after robbing and raping these two women, Carter rear-ended another woman and stole her purse.

Continue reading

A recent report in the Charlotte Observer indicates that former United States Senator John Edwards is facing serious criminal charges. He has evidently elected to take the case to trial and jury selection is set to begin any day now. Edwards is facing significant criminal charges that could land him in prison for up to 30 years and that could force him to pay $1.5 million in fines.

Last year, the federal government indicted Edwards on campaign finance violations. The government alleged that the then Senator used money that was donated to his presidential campaign to keep his mistress, Rielle Hunter, hidden from the public so as not to damage his chances of winning the election. Post #1 criminal image 4.17.12.pngAn individual close to the investigation and the case told the Charlotte Observer that Edwards was offered a plea deal where he would only serve 6 months in jail and still be able to practice law, but Edwards rejected that offer. He said that he would take his chances with a jury. In a press conference, Edwards said, “After all these years, I finally get my day in court and people get to hear my side of this, and what actually happened . . . And what I know with complete and absolute certainty is I didn’t violate campaign laws and I never for a second believed I was violating campaign laws.”

The trial is one that all will be sure to watch, not only because of the celebrity of the defendant, but because the case is poised to be legally significant. At the center of the case is the question of what constitutes a campaign donation. The legal debate surrounds Edwards’ knowledge of payments made by his campaign finance chairman, Fred Baron, and another donor, Rachel “Bunny” Mellon whose funds paid for Rielle Hunter’s medical care while she was pregnant with Edwards’ child, as well as hotels and private jets. Edwards denies any knowledge of those funds, but his attorneys believe that even if he did have knowledge of the money that knowledge would not be a violation of federal law. This is because Edwards’ motive for using the money was to keep his dying wife, Elizabeth, from finding out about the affair between him and Hunter, and not to influence the outcome of the presidential election.

In addition to the legal arguments, Edwards’ attorneys are also claiming that the prosecution has political motives. In several pre-trial hearings, lead attorney Abbe Lowell, claimed that the government’s reasoning was flawed and that the grand jury was tainted “and that the Republican federal prosecutor who led the investigation, now-congressional candidate George Holding, was motivated by partisanship.” Even the Federal Election Commission has declined to proceed against Edwards after reviewing his case. The Center for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) filed a brief in support of Edwards’ legal position, saying “In the United States, we don’t prosecute people for being loathsome, we prosecute them for violating the law… The real reason for these payments is obvious: To prevent Mr. Edwards’ cancer-stricken wife from finding out about the affair. This makes him despicable, but not a criminal.”

Continue reading

WBTV recently reported that a 7-year-old girl was nearly abducted. On Saturday, March 31, 2012, the police responded to an emergency on Long Creek Drive. Some reported that a little girl was snatched by a man while she was playing. Witnesses told the investigators that a man picked up the small girl and ran behind the apartment building. Fortunately, the girl knew enough to scream for help and the man put her down and fled the scene.

Police now have a description of the suspect. Post #2 criminal image 4.9.12.jpgHe is described as a Hispanic male, between the ages of 25 and 30, with dark spikey hair. Since the incident has happened, investigators are taking it seriously and are vigorously investigating the case, but they have yet to arrest anyone for the attempted abduction.

Nearly two months ago, the WFMY News in Greensboro, North Carolina reported an attempted abduction of another small girl in Georgia that had parents on high alert. The report emphasized that parents should be diligent about teaching their children how to avoid being abducted. Since the recent attempted abduction of the 7-year-old on Long Creek Drive, Charlotte parents could benefit from teaching their kids about how to detect danger and how to avoid it.

Continue reading

According to a recent report by the Charlotte Observer, some in North Carolina are concerned about how the police are gathering and using cell phone data. Because of the ease with which law enforcement officials can obtain cell phone information, those concerned about the protection of civil liberties believe that police should be more diligent about obtaining warrants for that information.

Cell phone data has proven useful to law enforcement. Post #1 criminal image 4.9.12.jpgThe technology allows police to track not only the calls made by a cell phone user, but also the phone’s location, and by implication, the location of the cell phone’s user. The problem is that the police can obtain that information from the cell phone service provider without the knowledge or consent of the cell phone user. This lack of knowledge or consent prompted the ACLU to conduct a study of the process and procedures that law enforcement officials use to obtain cell phone records. The study revealed a disturbing trend.

The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department told the ACLU that its policies require producing a search warrant issued by a judge prior to obtaining cell phone records. Before the judge will issue a search warrant, the officer applying for the warrant has to show probable cause.

Other police departments do not require its officers to obtain a search warrant prior to receiving cell phone records, giving some Charlotte criminal defense attorneys cause for concern. One attorney said, “The states and the federal government haven’t set up laws about what is still private and what is protected activity. The government hasn’t kept up with the technological advances. The police are getting to know all kinds of information that should be private.”

Continue reading

According to a recent report by WBTV news, the lawyer’s for Trayvon Martin’s family gave an exclusive interview to the board of the National Association of Black Journalists (NABJ). One of the reporters for WBTV is a regional director for the association and sat in on the interview.

For those who may not know, Trayvon Martin is the 17-year-old young man from Florida who was killed by George Zimmerman, the head of the neighborhood watch in his area. Zimmerman is claiming that the killing was in self-defense. Post #2 criminal image 4.4.12.jpgThe initial investigation by the Sanford, Florida police department did not result in an arrest of Zimmerman. Since then, Martin’s death had received national media attention and now the case is under investigation by the Florida State’s Attorney’s office and the Justice Department.

Daryl Parks represents the Martin family. He told NABJ that the family has meet with the state’s attorney’s office and with the Department of Justice. They are waiting to hear from both agencies about how long the investigation will take, but the family is hopeful and optimistic, believing that eventually they will have justice for their son.

Parks expressed his opinion about the legal significance of the evidence against Zimmerman. He said that he does not believe that there is enough evidence to charge Zimmerman with a hate crime, which would eliminate the federal government from the potential prosecution; however, he does believe that there is enough evidence to make an arrest for some form of homicide.

In addition to the potential criminal charges, Parks told NABJ that the family is going to file a civil claim against Zimmerman and against the Home Owner’s Association. “Parks told the NABJ he has information to show the HOA told residents how to handle any problems within the neighborhood – that was to call police first and Zimmerman next. The question then is – did the HOA deputize Zimmerman to protect the community?” If the HOA gave Zimmerman the power to protect the community and he did so in a way that was against the law, the HOA may be liable for Martin’s death.

The Martin family was recently Washington, D.C. being briefed by the House of Representatives on hate crimes. They were hosted by Representative Shelia Jackson Lee of Texas who believes that the federal government should do whatever it can to put pressure on the state of Florida to arrest and try Zimmerman.

Continue reading

A report from WBTV reveals that Danny Hembree’s murder trial is heating up. Prosecutors in the trial played Hembree’s taped confession for the jurors on Monday, March 26, 2012. Hembree was being interviewed by the police when he confessed to killing Randi Saldana.

During the interview, Hembree told investigators that he had to get some things “off of his chest.” He was calm when he revealed how he had lured Saldana to his mother’s house in 2009 with the promise of crack cocaine. He told them that he used his hands to choke her and then repeatedly punched her in the face. He said, “It just seemed like she wouldn’t die. She wouldn’t stop bleeding.” Post #1 criminal image 4.2.12.jpgHembree also told investigators that the murder happened while his mother was in the kitchen.

On Thursday, March 22, 2012, Saldana’s sister, Shellie Nations, took the stand at Hembree’s trial and choked back tears as she had to identify the butterfly necklace and boots that Saldana was wearing the last time she saw her sister alive. On cross-examination, Hembree’s defense attorney asked Nations about Saldana’s drug abuse.

After Nations’ testimony, the prosecutors played Hembree’s confession to the jury. They also showed the jury the lamp that Hembree used to tie up Saldana’s legs. During the confession, Hembree admitted to setting Saldana’s body on fire and then taking her body to South Carolina to dump it.

Hembree is a unique defendant because at the time of this trial, he was currently serving a capital sentence for the murder of Heather Cotton, who was 17 at the time of her death. In Saldana’s case, the prosecutors did not pursue the death penalty.

Continue reading

The former town administrator for Harrisburg, North Carolina is currently facing several felony charges according to a recent report by the Charlotte Observer. Michelle Reapsmith has been charged with three separate counts of receiving property by false pretenses. The charges come after an intense investigation and audit of the town’s financial records.

According to Bob Scaggs, a member of the Harrisburg Town Council, the investigation began after an inspection of the town’s financial records raised red flags while Reapsmith was reviewing contracts for the city. harrisburg town hall.jpgAt that point, the Cabarrus County Sherriff and the State Bureau of Investigation began to take a closer look at the town’s financial records. The article in the Charlotte Observer does not go into detail regarding the discrepancies in the financial records.

Back in October, the town council called an emergency Saturday meeting and voted to remove Reapsmith from her position without pay until her contract expired in November. According to Reapsmith, it was mutually beneficial for her to step down. She was hired in 2009 as the town’s financial director and then was promoted in 2010 to the town’s administrator. When she was hired, however, she was not the candidate recommended for the position by the North Carolina Council of Governments, according to Mr. Scaggs. Because of the discrepancies with the financial record, Reapsmith was not paid a severance package after she was removed from her position as town administrator.

After being charged with three counts of receiving stolen property under false pretenses, records reveal that Reapsmith’s initial appearance in court was for Monday, March 19, 2012. The district attorney, however, did not have a record of the charges as of Tuesday, March 20, 2012, according to a representative of the Carrabus County District Attorney’s Office.

Continue reading

Contact Information